User Access
Stereotyping & Religion
« Back To Roofers Talk
kegolliday
No Jedd.....I don't mean to antagonise.....lets say my lack of ability for wordage?or my ignorance of the English vocabulary?, better fits me, and who knows me better than me?..eh. Theorise it is then, lets move on. Even tho I learned today , that concoc>>>
tinner666
A good read Mike. Behavior says it all, doesn't it.>>>
Anarchist
Unless antagonism is your goal, you could use the word theorise, to replace invented or concocted seeing as you correctly state that it is a theory. >>>>>> THEORY. Def 5: a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles>>>
Mike H
Received this today. I enjoyed the read, and thought it was appropriate to much of the conversation taking place. _______________________________________________________________________
Helping Children (and Adults) to Become Good People
Rich Nathan Co>>>
Mike H
tinner666 wrote: [quote]No hostility here. Against 'God', anyway, or religion. I get hostile when I find myself against someone proclaiming Christianity and Christian views, but that same someone is showing him/her self to be a total hypocrite. >>>
DCROOF
I forgive ya. I've been called much worse . Thanks Mike for framing the answer I tried to in a more understandable form.>>>
Mike H
As a science student, one of the big problems is that real science requires observable results and repeatable technique. Of course we cannot repeat the creation of the earth or the lives that have occupied it.
Darwin observed the generational changes wi>>>
tinner666
Though the beliefs/views expressed here are different, every one of us, unless I missed something, seem to possess the same morals.
I feel that all on earth should treat all others with dignity and respect and that should be reciprocated by all.>>>
Mike H
Jedd wrote: [quote]Unless antagonism is your goal, you could use the word theorise, to replace invented or concocted seeing as you correctly state that it is a theory. >>>>>> THEORY. Def 5: a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle>>>
wywoody
Oh I don't know CIAK, I must have misinterpreted "This is a dialogue that actually goes nowhere" and "the line is drawn on both sides digging in". No disrespect meant calling you God, either.B)>>>
Mike H
Jedd wrote: [quote]Why does my failure to be perfect negate anything I might say? .........It does'nt Mike, that isn't what I meant. What I am saying is that proclaiming to be a christian, but w/out the christian attitude, then justifying the beh>>>
DCROOF
wywoody How so ?? What was it that I did to make you think this thread is finished . Is it important to you to discuss this subject of evolution vs creationism ? What is so important about it . If you could explain that to me I would gladly participate>>>
wywoody
On the eighth day God (well Chuck) said this thread is done.>>>
DCROOF
This is an dialogue that actually goes nowhere for those involved. The line is drawn on both sides digging in and investigating a response to counter the other. It is unprovable and we end up chasing our imagination . It is not so unlike the kamikaze pilo>>>
kegolliday
Unless antagonism is your goal, you could use the word theorise, to replace invented or concocted seeing as you correctly state that it is a theory. >>>>>> THEORY. Def 5: a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles off>>>
User Access