Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

User Access


Ad alt tag
McElroy Metals -  Ad - May 2022
Coffee Conversations
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

Rope study ?

« Back To Roofers Talk
Author
Posts
January 17, 2009 at 7:49 a.m.

wywoody

Anybody know of a study ever done on roofer output being fully fall protected vs. unprotected. My guess is that it slows things down about 20%. In fact, the only way I could see it not slowing production would be if you had a worker that could channel the anger generated by the rope into working faster.>>>

January 19, 2009 at 3:06 p.m.

ottawa_roofer

Well i have enough hoses on the roof from the guns, i don't need exta obsticals. So that being said i like roof jacks better. on new construction it is maditory to have ropes and harness, with a hard hat go figger, with construction boots....>>>

January 19, 2009 at 12:41 p.m.

The Roofing God

>>>

January 19, 2009 at 12:36 p.m.

The Roofing God

who needs stinkin` ropes ? >>>

January 19, 2009 at 12:28 p.m.

Jed

Sweet, I like it..... that delete button that shows up in your own posts is gonna cause trouble sooner or later....>>>

January 19, 2009 at 12:09 p.m.

Webmaster Steve

There ya go there is now a button at the top for Photo Albums :P>>>

January 19, 2009 at 11:58 a.m.

Webmaster Steve

I fixed the copy url page.

You dont have to click the Add Image button I included it in the copy function you just need to adjust the width = after pasting the code.

>>>

January 18, 2009 at 7:40 p.m.

tinner666

It's here for all albums.http://rcs.si-sv2628.com/album_owners.asp

We can't link to pics though. :blink:>>>

January 18, 2009 at 7:38 p.m.

OLE Willie

If you see a roofer hanging from a rope around here its either a suicide or a homicide! lol 30% slower!>>>

January 18, 2009 at 5:39 p.m.

wywoody

Vaa, since the big change here, you're the only guy that has posted pictures. Are your pictures straight off your pute or are they through a picture site link?

Tom, About ten years ago I bought a couple of the yo-yo-on-a-stick elevated anchors. They had straps instead of cable. I liked them but one lasted about two years and the other about five. One of the drawbacks was it limited putting on the top battens and nailers around the ridge until much later in the project.

The guy I bought them from was delivering tile as a piece-work job for a tile company. He complained that the yoyo would catch and stop him whenever he tried to hurry and that he preferred the ropes like I had. I jokingly offered to trade him and he asked how much money I would give with the ropes to trade. I told him I could go to a cash machine and get him $200 and he jumped on it. Years later I found out they weren't his to sell, so I guess we both made out on that deal.>>>

January 18, 2009 at 3:29 p.m.

TomB

Wywoody; I was going to address tile, but didn't think many on here did much....We used to do primarily tile...We used an elevated/swiveling anchor, (aprx. 48" off the roof peak), with retractable cables....Considerable expense over conventional ropes, but productivity increased substantially, as you didn't have the ropes tangling btwn. stacks of tile, knocking them over, etc....

It's been 10 yrs.....My best recollection of the increased labor costs over going with a non-fall arrest equipment would go something like this; On ptiches to 6/12 add 50% to the direct labor utilizing conventional ropes/harnesses....Add 25% if utilizing elevated, retractable cable systems.....The elevated/retractable route may prove in-efficient unless your doing enough quantity to justify the increased costs....We were doing aprx. 2,000 sqs./mo.>>>

January 18, 2009 at 11:11 a.m.

tinner666

It adds 10-15% to the time. Setting up takes time. Tearing down does too. Not just lost time stumbling around the stuff.

You also have to firure the ropes and harnesses are only good for X number of jobs and have to be regurally replaced to be fully compliant. Figure another $150. per job/day for wear and tear.>>>

January 18, 2009 at 9:57 a.m.

wywoody

Thanks for the responses, but so far no one has really addressed the issue I was seeking. I just wanted a guess at what percentage of output difference being roped up causes. For those of you that are now fully compliant, but were more lax in the past, how much (if any) did you raise your labor rates to be in compliance. I would think that for comp installation, it would have been very easy to check comparable jobs and get the difference in output figures to make an adjustment.

In my case, specializing in tile, to be in compliance required me to totally restructure my operation and drastically cut down the number of employees I have.>>>

January 18, 2009 at 1:56 a.m.

The Roofing God

but the rope wasn`t attached when you were going down the ladder, right ? I think it slows things down on walkable,but can even be put to use on scaffold work>>>

January 17, 2009 at 11:25 a.m.

tinner666

Don't take my comments wrong. THis crap of safety harnesses on every roof is silly. Ropes all over a1 storey 4/12??????>>>

January 17, 2009 at 10:55 a.m.

TomB

On very high & steep slopes, it hasn't hindered our production.....If fact, it may improve it through nothing more than worker safety confidence.

On lower slopes, it most definitely slows things down...However, it's just a cost of doing business, (kinda like the WC/labor burden thing).

I will commnet, that years ago, (aprx. 1983 I think), we were forced to utilize belts/harnesses on a 1/2 in 12 pitch BUR job we were doing.....Immediately one of my guys, stepped on a rope which rolled under his foot causing him to fall, thereby submerging his hand in a full mop kart.....Wasn't pretty...>>>


« Back To Roofers Talk
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Coffee Conversations - Banner Ad - Roofing & Homes for our Troops On Demand (Sponsored by ABC Supply)
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

User Access


Ad alt tag
McElroy Metals -  Ad - May 2022

Loading…
Loading the web debug toolbar…
Attempt #